aeris22’s avataraeris22’s Twitter Archive—№ 83,032

      1. @nightpool Hello ! To answer to github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/11129#issuecomment-504043466, there is a lot of issue with your point of view. Asking for source code censorship is opening the door for government censorship. It will be more difficult for us to fight censorship bills (France currently have one in
    1. …in reply to @aeris22
      preparation) if we already have censor on our software.
  1. …in reply to @aeris22
    @nightpool Defining censorship criteria is open the door for any censorship, and if we do this « for this », we will have to do « for that ».
    1. …in reply to @aeris22
      @nightpool For free software, a software requiring forking to be usable is not a free software. We exactly have the case in France with « Liberté 0 », an association fighting for really free software usable by disabled people *without forking*. I guess you will agree that
      1. …in reply to @aeris22
        requiring a fork to be able to use a software because you are blind or colorblind is not legit. And so it's the same for the blocklist. Requiring fork to be usable by everybody is not free software.
    2. …in reply to @aeris22
      @nightpool For free software, a software requiring forking to be usable is not a free software. We exactly have the case in France with « Liberté 0 », an association fighting for really free software usable by disabled people *without forking*. Having software only usable with a
      1. …in reply to @aeris22
        fork is not having a free software.
    3. …in reply to @aeris22
      @nightpool For free software, a software requiring forking to be usable is not a free software. We exactly have the case in France with « Liberté 0 », fighting for really free software usable by disabled people *without forking*. Having software only usable with a fork is not
      1. …in reply to @aeris22
        having a free software.