aeris22โ€™s avataraeris22โ€™s Twitter Archiveโ€”โ„– 119,341

  1. โ€ฆin reply to @xeraa
    @xeraa @noiruh @HujinoKun26 Netherland just provide a DPIA about this facts and spoiler, it's not good at all. As long as there is a ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ part somewhere, it's covered by FISA. ncsc.nl/documenten/publicaties/2022/augustus/16/cloud-act-memo
    1. โ€ฆin reply to @aeris22
      @xeraa @noiruh @HujinoKun26 And it's very very wide. Even a single ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ employee on a ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ company is enough to trigger FISA (via gag order and risk for this employee to be forced to provide data with prohibit to inform it employer).
      1. โ€ฆin reply to @aeris22
        @xeraa @noiruh @HujinoKun26 Licence usage is enough. Even just a ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ company selling something to ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ a single time is theorically enough to trigger FISA (but in this case the ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ can/must refuse to cooperate, but may faced prosecution and penalties if refused)