aeris22’s avataraeris22’s Twitter Archive—№ 32,669

  1. …in reply to @mydataangel
    .@mydataangel @semanticist Yep, and snake-oil-crypto is snake-oil-crypto.
    On twitter.com Twitter logo aeris22’s avatar ♻️ 3 Retweets ❤️ 2 Favorites Mood 0
    1. …in reply to @aeris22
      .@mydataangel @semanticist You have no scientific paper to show, no code to audit, no crypto review of your new algorithm.
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo aeris22’s avatar ♻️ 2 Retweets ❤️ 3 Favorites Mood -3 🙁
      1. …in reply to @aeris22
        .@mydataangel @semanticist Without *ALL* of this, sane people must assume you’re just yet another plain old snake oil crypto.
        Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo aeris22’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood 0
        1. …in reply to @aeris22
          .@mydataangel @semanticist Your single "1024kb" cipher assertion is just a big proof of snake-oil. Size don’t matter in crypto.
          Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo aeris22’s avatar ❤️ 1 Favorite Mood +2 🙂
          1. …in reply to @aeris22
            .@mydataangel @semanticist 128bits symmetric is better than 1024bits asymmetric. AES128 is better than AES256. etc.
            Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo aeris22’s avatar Mood +4 🙂
            1. …in reply to @aeris22
              .@mydataangel @semanticist And with current state of the art, 512*k*b crypto is atrociously slow and have bunch of side effect …
              Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo aeris22’s avatar Mood 0
              1. …in reply to @aeris22
                .@mydataangel @semanticist For exemple to encrypt data less than this block size. Even a single mail doesn’t reach this size.
                Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo aeris22’s avatar Mood 0